🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing group of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid first step," said the European lawmaker behind the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have raised concerns. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts argues that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, legislation is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some figures to follow the Australian example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Outside of the West, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in safety.

Even as this international discussion continues, the policies of Australia and others show that states internationally are increasingly content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.