🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding the remarks made by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's win over the American player during the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports often lend themselves to nationalism. Some disappointment was appropriate. Instead, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all love a storyline, me too. But come on. Even if Fritz had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the sport in succession. He is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final what other person sensibly had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive power on each front side and backhand are more than adequate to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, however, he is frequently helpless. The past few years has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of US male players lifting major titles when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

The American's play in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian triumphed in four sets, a victory that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to break. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When he finally did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much energy to prevail. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the following match and never especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only express his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a match, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for America failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {